[om-council] Joking... but not so much
rugyada
rugyada at gmail.com
Mon Feb 8 14:54:50 EST 2016
Or maybe this is the very first question to answer:
2016-02-05 18:09 GMT+01:00 rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com>:
>
> Q1: It makes sense to talk about 2014 release update, or your (@devs]
> plan is to abandon 2014/KDE4 ?
>
Please reply frankly :)
Aside: one point for keep support for 2014.x is we can "brand" and
advertise it as LTS, so it might be:
- OpenMandriva Lx2 LTS R'n'R Edition
- OpenMandriva LTS R'n'R Edition
- ......
or, more "acronymized" :)
- OMLx2 LTS R'n'R Edition
- OMLx LTS R'n'R Edition
or the most acronymized in the world :P
- OMLx LTS R'n'R Ed.
Cheers,
2016-02-08 15:49 GMT+01:00 rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-02-08 11:16 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Gajc <tpgxyz at gmail.com>:
>> I think that OpenMandriva Lx 2 is a good idea to do a release for this
>> product.
>> This needs couple of thasks to be managed before release:
>> 1. Rename to Lx 2 - medium effort (3-4 days, with testing), omdv-build-iso
>> needs to be adapted too
>> 2. Update X11 stack - big effort (around 1-2 weeks with testing)
>> 3. Others - medium effort (1-2 weeks with testing) - building ISO, testing
>> installation, overall integrity of product etc.
>> 3. Need a dedicated person who will lead the tasks and take care of doing a
>> release
>>
>
> Thanks Tomasz for comment and list of tasks + ETA from developers
> point of view, we need it in order to have a clear view before taking
> decisions.
>
>
>>
>> Putting focus on Lx 2 meas that Lx 3 is moving forward into future.
>>
>
>>
>> First let's answer the question. What is the main goal - Lx 3 or Lx 2 ?
>>
>
> Agree with the questions.
> Could we all discuss the topic and then get an overall plan?
> Do you think we should add Crisb in the loop?
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Best regards,
> Cristina
--
____________________
Best regards,
Cristina
More information about the OM-Council
mailing list