[om-council] Again "Beta" misunderstanding

Kate Lebedeff kate at lebedeff.co.uk
Sun Feb 28 13:03:19 EST 2016


i think they just forgot about it, this devrel was prepared very quickly before FOSDEM

worth putting as small agenda point for next meeting


> On 28Feb, 2016, at 18:52, rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 2016-02-28 17:29 GMT+01:00 Kate Lebedeff <kate at lebedeff.co.uk>:
>> I think we should forward this to cooker, so that they do not repeat it
>> 
> 
> Some time ago I sent this idea
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000072.html
> Just a piece of advice, and way before FOSDEM iso (and following
> misunderstandings)
> 
> << [...]The point is not to release ISOs named Beta untill they not soddisfy
> the Beta standards (Beta, here just as an example)
> 
> ISOs might be named
> OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel-PLASMA.x86_64.iso
> instead of
> OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-beta-PLASMA.x86_64.iso
> 
> Finally, when dev-rels will reach the requested standards, we can
> release the official Alpha, Beta, etc release for public download. >>
> 
> As it seems they didn't want to consider the suggested idea, I gave up :)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ____________________
> Best regards,
> Cristina
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Council mailing list
> OM-Council at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-council_ml.openmandriva.org




More information about the OM-Council mailing list