[OM Cooker] can we have xscreensaver off by default?

rugyada rugyada at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 19:22:22 EDT 2016


Screensaver is different from screen locker, you know.
I'd rather prefer xscreensaver doing the screensaver job - feature
screenlocker *disabled* - and screen locker its own (enabled or
disabled by default I personally don't care that much, although my
preference goes to disabled and users turn it on if they need)




2016-03-30 0:38 GMT+02:00 Ben Bullard <benbullard79 at cox.net>:
> Yes, I would also prefer screen locker off in default install. Users can
> turn on if needed.
>
> Ben Bullard
> ben79
> --------------------
> OpenMandriva-QA Team
>
> On 03/29/2016 12:45 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any chance we could have xscreensaver off by default? It seems to interfere
> with KDE's screen locking on its own. If people need it (as was previously
> justified), we can let them turn it on manually.
>
> Plus,
> https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2014/05/screenlocker-architecture-in-plasma-next/
>
> Robert
>
> --
> cheers, Robert :: rxu.io
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
>



-- 
____________________
Best regards,
Cristina



More information about the OM-Cooker mailing list