[OM Cooker] [om-qa] please stop publishing updates for 2014 direct to updates repo

Ben Bullard benbullard79 at cox.net
Tue Apr 26 10:37:01 EDT 2016


What exact repo are we using for testing packages?


Is there a defined process for approving packages in testing for 
publishing? This is in view of fact that Kahinah isn't functioning.


I will make a point of getting involved with testing for 2014 packages.


Ben Bullard
ben79
--------------------
OpenMandriva-QA Team

On 04/26/2016 08:41 AM, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin wrote:
> fixed, now all updates in 2014 first waiting for approval
>
> 2016-04-26 10:48 GMT+03:00 Kate Lebedeff <kate at lebedeff.co.uk 
> <mailto:kate at lebedeff.co.uk>>:
>
>     Hi Luca and all
>
>     To me it sounds like a point for tomorrow’s TC agenda,
>     “confirmation and accenting of following the rules, information”
>
>     Yes?
>
>
>
>>     On 25Apr, 2016, at 22:17, luca pedrielli <agoiza at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:agoiza at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Il 25/04/2016 21:41, Crispin Boylan ha scritto:
>>>     TPG why are you ignoring this?
>>>
>>>     our users have asked us not to publish untested updates direct
>>>     to the repos.  we cant run a so-called stable branch like this.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>     I'll stop updates till rules are respected.
>>     And I'll suggest this to all the community.
>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 28/03/16 22:40, Crispin Boylan wrote:
>>>>>     Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>>     Since kahinah broke down with the move to the new abf it's
>>>>>     fair to say
>>>>>     people (including myself) having been playing fast and loose with
>>>>>     doing updates for 2014.
>>>>>
>>>>>     We need to stop this now.  NO publishing direct to updates for
>>>>>     main/non-free/restricted, please only publish to testing repo.
>>>>>
>>>>>     QA people - please update from testing and let us know if
>>>>>     there are
>>>>>     any issues.  If after a week no-one squawks you can consider
>>>>>     this a
>>>>>     greenlight for your update (as per kahinah), and publish to
>>>>>     updates if
>>>>>     not already done.
>>>>>
>>>>>     I will monitor what gets put in testing, and send emails if
>>>>>     there are
>>>>>     any updates which we really should do more thorough testing before
>>>>>     releasing.
>>>>>
>>>>>     thanks
>>>>>     cris.
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     OM-Cooker mailing list
>>>>>     OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org
>>>>>     <mailto:OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org>
>>>>>     http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     OM-QA mailing list
>>>     OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org <mailto:OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org>
>>>     http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
>>>     .
>>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Saluti, Luca Pedrielli
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     OM-QA mailing list
>>     OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org <mailto:OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org>
>>     http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OM-Cooker mailing list
>     OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org <mailto:OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org>
>     http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/attachments/20160426/d3f6914c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OM-Cooker mailing list