[om-council] Council meeting April 21st follow-up [2]

rugyada rugyada at gmail.com
Sat Apr 23 02:49:42 EDT 2016


Hi,

2016-04-23 3:06 GMT+02:00 Kate Lebedeff <kate at lebedeff.co.uk>:
>
> this gets us back (imo) to discussion about rolling release
>
> and this part by Bero "(something the competitors have never done)” - could become our yet another strong point - to PR hard
>
> IF we figure out how to do it without burning out our very valued people
>

Just a thought,
we may want to read this log:
https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/OpenMandriva:Technical/M20130528
This is TC meeting of.... ---> Tuesday 2013-05-28 !!! :) <----

Guess worth to read around from:
[11:20] <bero> And possibly to talk about the 2 cookers idea


Excerpting some lines:

[11:20] <bero> And possibly to talk about the 2 cookers idea
[11:20] <Xu|Mobile> 2 cookers? As in branching?

[11:23] <bero> 2 cookers: That's an idea that would allow users to
stay on current stuff without risking breaking the system by running
full cooker

[11:24] <bero> Ideally, I'd like QA to test packages that hit cooker,
and copy them to cooker-stable after making sure it doesn't break
things badly

[11:27] <bero> We just have to make sure we have enough people to
maintain the stable cooker branch

[11:27] <rugyada> thrill cooker & rolling cooker ? :)
[11:27] <Xu|Mobile> QA will have to do some recruiting...
[11:27] <Xu|Mobile> rugyada: that's one way of putting it :)

[11:27] <bero> rugyada: yes - those may actually be good names
[11:28] <rugyada> ;)
[11:28] <rugyada> the less thrilling cooker may be a kind of rolling release


-- 
____________________
Best regards,
Cristina



More information about the OM-Council mailing list