[om-council] Again "Beta" misunderstanding
rugyada
rugyada at gmail.com
Sun Feb 28 08:58:40 EST 2016
Hi,
2016-02-28 14:02 GMT+01:00 Raphaël Jadot <rj at hodo.fr>:
> Hi :) I'm not sure to understand, beta should not really be considered as
> beta?
>
But we have no Beta release out yet... :)
Iso made for FOSDEM event was just one build "on the path to beta"
Once again I'd like to make you all notice that "beta" word in iso
filename is misleading.
It may be cause of misunderstandings like this, for example
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OpenMandriva-Lx-2015-Beta
In cooker ML:
http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000217.html
http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000223.html
http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000225.html
--
____________________
Best regards,
Cristina
More information about the OM-Council
mailing list