<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
We should set some kind of convention for naming .iso files so as to
avoid confusion about whether a specific build is/isn't Alpha, Beta,
RC, or GA. See these threads in fantastic new unified forum:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000072.html">http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000072.html</a><br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/most-recent-development-iso-build-14378-this-isnt-the-beta-release/301">https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/most-recent-development-iso-build-14378-this-isnt-the-beta-release/301</a><br>
<br>
In this instance I replaced 'beta' in file names to 'dev-rel' short
for 'development-release'. That's one way to do it. But perhaps it
would be even better to have build ID # in file name something like:<br>
<br>
This is actually originally rugyada's idea. Quoting rugyada here:<br>
<br>
Perhaps that could be done instead of 'dev-rel'?
<p>I'd say<br>
<code>OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel14378-PLASMA.x86_64.iso</code></p>
<p>or for better reading<br>
<code>OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel_14378-PLASMA.x86_64.iso</code></p>
I'd avoid whatever definition (alpha/beta/etc.) at all in
development releases file name.<br>
People do know that are dev-rel and in which development stage we
are<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Ben Bullard
ben79
--------------------
OpenMandriva-QA Team
</pre>
</body>
</html>