[om-council] Again "Beta" misunderstanding

Kate Lebedeff kate at lebedeff.co.uk
Sun Feb 28 11:29:06 EST 2016


I think we should forward this to cooker, so that they do not repeat it

and probably even make a separate blog post to clarify?



> On 28Feb, 2016, at 14:58, rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 2016-02-28 14:02 GMT+01:00 Raphaël Jadot <rj at hodo.fr>:
>> Hi :) I'm not sure to understand, beta should not really be considered as
>> beta?
>> 
> 
> But we have no Beta release out yet... :)
> 
> Iso made for FOSDEM event was just one build "on the path to beta"
> 
> Once again I'd like to make you all notice that "beta" word in iso
> filename is misleading.
> 
> It may be cause of misunderstandings like this, for example
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OpenMandriva-Lx-2015-Beta
> 
> In cooker ML:
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000217.html
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000223.html
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-January/000225.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ____________________
> Best regards,
> Cristina
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Council mailing list
> OM-Council at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-council_ml.openmandriva.org




More information about the OM-Council mailing list