<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 30/06/2016 17:04, Jean-Claude Vanier
      ha scritto:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAFXDyr+d2woJ6tFKStbNBOB-SXnc3DqiJFqE3kZNEufZ95yYdQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">Two questions:
-- currently we have 4 repositories;  this number will increase for
each new release, according to the current model;
   the proposed changes will keep 4 repositories forever, as there
will not be "new" release. So, at start, the benefit, in terms of
space required, is not that important.
   Is that correct?

-- imagine we are, let's say ten years in the future:
   "Legacy" (=2013) is still the same?
   "LTS" evolves "slowly" and still features kde4?
   "Stable" features "plasmic13" (the evolution of kde project in ten years)
   "Cooker" is still cooking

   I guess there will be a kind of shift and old releases will have to
be abandoned and we should adopt, from the beginning, a rule for that.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    +1<br>
    <br>
    The proposal of TPG is interesting.<br>
    <br>
    <span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="alt-edited">I
        do not find</span> <span>great difficulty</span> <span>for the</span>
      <span>ordinary work</span> <span>of everyday</span><span>.</span><br>
      <span>but what happens</span> <span>in the case of</span> <span>big</span>
      <span>technical news</span> <span>?:</span><br>
      <br>
      <span>kde4-</span><span>></span> <span>plasma,</span> <span>python2-</span><span>></span>
      <span>python3</span><span>,</span> <span>gcc-</span><span>></span>
      <span>clang</span> <span>are</span> <span>only</span> <span>some</span>
      <span>news</span> present <span>in</span> <span>3.0<br>
        <br>
      </span><span>how can</span> <span class="">news</span> <span
        class="">like these</span> <span>"</span><span>rolling"</span>
      <span>in stable</span> <span>easily</span><span>?</span></span><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAFXDyr+d2woJ6tFKStbNBOB-SXnc3DqiJFqE3kZNEufZ95yYdQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">



2016-06-30 16:06 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Gajc <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tpgxyz@gmail.com"><tpgxyz@gmail.com></a>:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">Hi,

i'd like to share with you an idea that was presented by me on OMA meeting
in Krakow 2015. Idea was warmly welcomed by attendants of that meeting :)

<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Pseudo_rolling_release_model">https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Pseudo_rolling_release_model</a>

I'd like to request you for comments on this proposition. Please read
carefully above wiki page, especially focus on benefits.

Next steps are:
* Talk on this on TC meeting
* Agree on reject implementation of this model
* if agreed prepare a plan with tasks that must be achieven to achieve this
goal.

Again i welcome you into a discussion.

_______________________________________________
OM-QA mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OM-QA@ml.openmandriva.org">OM-QA@ml.openmandriva.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org">http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org</a>

</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
_______________________________________________
OM-QA mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OM-QA@ml.openmandriva.org">OM-QA@ml.openmandriva.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org">http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org</a>

</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Saluti, Luca Pedrielli </pre>
  </body>
</html>