[OM Cooker] Discussions around new packaging formats

Jean-Claude Vanier jclvanier at gmail.com
Mon Jun 27 03:02:09 EDT 2016


>From the link you gave, I see this sentence:
"Er sieht die Rolle des Paketbetreuers als zentrales Kontrollelement
für den Erfolg freier Software und befürchtet, dass die neuen Formate
vor allem schlechte Entwickler belohnen würden"
"He sees the role of the package maintainer as a central control
element for the success of free software and is concerned that the new
formats would reward especially bad developer"

If this translation is correct, I guess it's urgent to wait :)

2016-06-26 23:36 GMT+02:00 Ben Bullard <benbullard79 at cox.net>:
> Maybe we should adopt Ubuntu and fix it.:-P
>
> Ye Olde Curmudgeon
> Ben Bullard
> ben79
> --------------------
> OpenMandriva-QA Team
>
> On 06/26/2016 04:17 PM, Maik Wagner wrote:
>
> Dear Cookers,
>
> I noticed a couple of discussions on the German Linux News Sites such as
> heise.de or pro-linux.de that package management is apparently changing.
> Instead of the rpm/yum or dpkg/apt-get discussions there seem to be some new
> contenders: Snappy, Flatpack, AppImage etc.
>
> http://www.heise.de/ix/meldung/Richtungswechsel-Diskussion-um-neue-Linux-Paketformate-3244636.html
>
> Might adopting one of these be beneficial?
>
> Have a good week,
>
>
> Maik
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
>



More information about the OM-Cooker mailing list