[om-qa] [OM Cooker] Development release - dev-rel - DR

Blackcrack blackcrack at blackysgate.de
Thu Jan 14 09:10:51 EST 2016


maybe something like by reactos, the drunk, on the first Page of OM HP
http://www.reactos.org -> Trunk Builds, the bottom green button
Actual Builds, there be autobuld iso's in 7zip for save the md5 or 
something,
if have the 7zip pack an trouble it's the iso not okey, nice security 
trick .
And the https://abf.io/platforms/cooker/products, i guess, should be 
possible
for pulling or pushing the iso's in a 7zip and move it into an folder 
where listed
all files like my php-filemirrorfrom the info a ftp or something ..
to be in the able linking the place unter a button like Reactos it does.

under the Button
"Download Open Mandriva LX"
"Download OM LX DV's (Hot)"  -> From the ABF
"Download OM Lx nightly's (Super Hot)" -> From Roberts server

the words "Hot" and "Super Hot" aims the peoples for trying out and have 
fun,
and maybe also for more bughunters ..

it's the best possible like i guess .. if it's possible ..

best regards
Blacky

Am 14.01.2016 um 08:21 schrieb Robert Xu:
> In a way, this concept is akin to nightlies (which, by the way, are
> being built at https://nightly.rxu.io/ (though the latest ones are
> failing...)).
>
> Maybe we should have a pipeline where we promote builds based on
> nightlies. Dates will also help us make sure that the numbers are
> increasing (and also mean something). Then, we can say something like
> "we consider build 20160101 beta quality" and release it as is.
>
> It might be easier to manage that way.
>
> On 13 January 2016 at 21:42, Ben Bullard <benbullard79 at cox.net> wrote:
>> Good idea. If I understand instead of calling an .iso Alpha or Beta instead
>> name it dev-rel and then we testers refer to it by "dev-rel <build ID #>"
>> like this dev-rel 14025? Then Alpha and Beta releases are public and
>> official releases only?
>>
>> Ben Bullard
>> ben79
>> --------------------
>> OpenMandriva-QA Team
>>
>> On 01/13/2016 01:39 PM, rugyada wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Resurrecting an old idea of mine, previously just sketched and never
>> officially submitted, I'd like to propose the following:
>>
>> Currently during all the development time, ISOs are being named Alpha
>> / Beta / aso.
>> For some people, maybe bit more properly but imho not really correct
>> or widely/commonly decided/agreed, are being called pre-Alpha /
>> pre-Beta / aso.
>>
>> This way, it happens that ISOs built *along the path* which leads to
>> Alpha, Beta, etc. are not yet A/B/etc actually.
>>
>> This preamble in order to explain the "problem" and submitting
>> possible "solution".
>>
>> Suggestion is to name the WIP ISO builds (pre-* ) as
>> Development Release  - short name: dev-rel - acronym: DR
>>
>> So I can say for example: "I'm testing dev-rel 14025" or "I've
>> installed DR 14025 iso" or "Call for testing dev-rel 14025 for bug
>> hunting"
>>
>> The point is not to release ISOs named Beta untill they not soddisfy
>> the Beta standards (Beta, here just as an example)
>>
>> ISOs might be named
>> OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel-PLASMA.x86_64.iso
>> instead of
>> OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-beta-PLASMA.x86_64.iso
>>
>> Finally, when dev-rels will reach the requested standards, we can
>> release the official Alpha, Beta, etc release for public download.
>>
>> Just an idea, hopefully you may have some time to consider it.
>> Thank you for your attention.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OM-QA mailing list
>> OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org
>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
>>
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org/attachments/20160114/593f3182/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OM-QA mailing list