[om-qa] Go/NoGo vote and meeting for .iso's 130/131
luca pedrielli
luca.pedrielli at gmail.com
Sun Apr 3 08:37:39 EDT 2016
Il 03/04/2016 14:16, rugyada ha scritto:
> Hi,
> just want to add one comment here:
>
> 2016-04-03 13:39 GMT+02:00 Ben Bullard <benbullard79 at cox.net>:
>> Plymouth has been disappointing did not know we were considering removing.
>> That won't look good. I fear it will be bad for public relations. Reviewers,
>> new people trying, ect, trying to recruit students, schools, etc. - Ben
>>
> Plymouth is just cosmetic. It may sound strange to read it from
> artwork team member... but really I'd prefer to see a quick console
> running (it takes just a very short time if without any images and
> scritp loading, people may not even realize that's missing if they
> didn't know) than 3 sad square dots standing on my desktop waiting for
> dunnowhat :)
>
>
>
plymouth is a useless program
if we are not able to make it work, let's remove it
--
Saluti, Luca Pedrielli
More information about the OM-QA
mailing list