[om-qa] [RFC] Pseudo rolling release model
Jean-Claude Vanier
jclvanier at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 11:04:06 EDT 2016
Two questions:
-- currently we have 4 repositories; this number will increase for
each new release, according to the current model;
the proposed changes will keep 4 repositories forever, as there
will not be "new" release. So, at start, the benefit, in terms of
space required, is not that important.
Is that correct?
-- imagine we are, let's say ten years in the future:
"Legacy" (=2013) is still the same?
"LTS" evolves "slowly" and still features kde4?
"Stable" features "plasmic13" (the evolution of kde project in ten years)
"Cooker" is still cooking
I guess there will be a kind of shift and old releases will have to
be abandoned and we should adopt, from the beginning, a rule for that.
2016-06-30 16:06 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Gajc <tpgxyz at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> i'd like to share with you an idea that was presented by me on OMA meeting
> in Krakow 2015. Idea was warmly welcomed by attendants of that meeting :)
>
> https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Pseudo_rolling_release_model
>
> I'd like to request you for comments on this proposition. Please read
> carefully above wiki page, especially focus on benefits.
>
> Next steps are:
> * Talk on this on TC meeting
> * Agree on reject implementation of this model
> * if agreed prepare a plan with tasks that must be achieven to achieve this
> goal.
>
> Again i welcome you into a discussion.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-QA mailing list
> OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
>
More information about the OM-QA
mailing list