[om-qa] [OM Cooker] Are we a Go for release of Beta2?
Ben Bullard
benbullard79 at cox.net
Sat Jun 18 14:03:00 EDT 2016
Here .iso # 350 is a GO.
Are we there yet?
Ben Bullard
ben79
--------------------
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 06/17/2016 01:16 PM, Colin Close wrote:
> I think it's getting to the point where we need to draw a mark in the sand.
> I would suggest that if the OM Welcome is not sorted out by tomorrow evening we go with what we have as BETA2.
> We can always cover the issue in the Release Notes.
> Perhaps then we can make a proper timetable for the RC and what if anything should updated in the then current BETA.
> A period on minimal changes is needed so that overall stability can be assessed as well as collecting together
> any bugs that may be reported outside of the QA realm.
> It's very difficult to chase a moving target and gain any meaningful test results.
> Thoughts..Suggestions?
> Colin
>
> On Friday, 17 June 2016 19:00:35 BST Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>> On 2016-06-17 18:37, Ben Bullard wrote:
>>
>>> Is .iso # 342 sufficiently tested and OK for a release for Beta2?
>> om-welcome isn't working. We have a "fix", but are still looking at a
>> proper solution (one that doesn't involve pulling in the whole python 2
>> stack as dependencies).
>> Unfortunately my initial fix for that is only partially working.
>>
>> ttyl
>> bero
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OM-QA mailing list
>> OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org
>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-QA mailing list
> OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org/attachments/20160618/e4ced2ef/attachment.html>
More information about the OM-QA
mailing list