[om-qa] [OM Cooker] Development release - dev-rel - DR
rugyada
rugyada at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 04:36:18 EST 2016
@Ben
Yes.
@All
Every good improvement achieving the purpose of the basic idea (if agreed)
is welcome.
Il 14/gen/2016 08:22, "Robert Xu" <robxu9 at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> In a way, this concept is akin to nightlies (which, by the way, are
> being built at https://nightly.rxu.io/ (though the latest ones are
> failing...)).
>
> Maybe we should have a pipeline where we promote builds based on
> nightlies. Dates will also help us make sure that the numbers are
> increasing (and also mean something). Then, we can say something like
> "we consider build 20160101 beta quality" and release it as is.
>
> It might be easier to manage that way.
>
> On 13 January 2016 at 21:42, Ben Bullard <benbullard79 at cox.net> wrote:
> > Good idea. If I understand instead of calling an .iso Alpha or Beta
> instead
> > name it dev-rel and then we testers refer to it by "dev-rel <build ID #>"
> > like this dev-rel 14025? Then Alpha and Beta releases are public and
> > official releases only?
> >
> > Ben Bullard
> > ben79
> > --------------------
> > OpenMandriva-QA Team
> >
> > On 01/13/2016 01:39 PM, rugyada wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Resurrecting an old idea of mine, previously just sketched and never
> > officially submitted, I'd like to propose the following:
> >
> > Currently during all the development time, ISOs are being named Alpha
> > / Beta / aso.
> > For some people, maybe bit more properly but imho not really correct
> > or widely/commonly decided/agreed, are being called pre-Alpha /
> > pre-Beta / aso.
> >
> > This way, it happens that ISOs built *along the path* which leads to
> > Alpha, Beta, etc. are not yet A/B/etc actually.
> >
> > This preamble in order to explain the "problem" and submitting
> > possible "solution".
> >
> > Suggestion is to name the WIP ISO builds (pre-* ) as
> > Development Release - short name: dev-rel - acronym: DR
> >
> > So I can say for example: "I'm testing dev-rel 14025" or "I've
> > installed DR 14025 iso" or "Call for testing dev-rel 14025 for bug
> > hunting"
> >
> > The point is not to release ISOs named Beta untill they not soddisfy
> > the Beta standards (Beta, here just as an example)
> >
> > ISOs might be named
> > OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel-PLASMA.x86_64.iso
> > instead of
> > OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-beta-PLASMA.x86_64.iso
> >
> > Finally, when dev-rels will reach the requested standards, we can
> > release the official Alpha, Beta, etc release for public download.
> >
> > Just an idea, hopefully you may have some time to consider it.
> > Thank you for your attention.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OM-QA mailing list
> > OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org
> > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-QA mailing list
> OM-QA at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org/attachments/20160114/d06eaafc/attachment.html>
More information about the OM-QA
mailing list