[OM Cooker] Phoronix Benchmarks
Jean-Claude Vanier
jclvanier at gmail.com
Tue Aug 23 03:49:30 EDT 2016
If I interpret correctly, the tests was made using the GCC compiler
for all the distros.
So what is measured is the performance of the benches built with GCC
on OmLx 3.0 built with LLVM/Clang.
Therefore, it measures the performance of GCC built with LLVM, on 3.0.
In addition, I don't know why the options (for GCC) are so different
between the distros.
2016-08-22 17:44 GMT+02:00 rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com>:
> Right. More than Council it should be TC topic :)
> Although I suppose that Bero and TPG won't make a single step behind :P
>
> 2016-08-22 15:40 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Gajc <tpgxyz at gmail.com>:
>> [...] You know no matter what they say, as they says
>>
>
> :D
> Well, a different POV...
> It takes all sorts to make a world LOL
>
>
>
> 2016-08-22 17:01 GMT+02:00 Raphaël Jadot <rj at hodo.fr>:
>> No experience neither on it.
>>
>> I'm not sure it's a failure, and also in some comments, some people seem to say it's the fastest distro.
>>
>> Really I'm not sure about how to react about it, if things were correct, it would be a decision from TC to make a meeting to discuss about it and take decisions...
>>
>> 22.08.2016, 14:21, "rugyada" <rugyada at gmail.com>:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> so, maybe something to be discussed at one of next C-meeting (?)
>>>
>>> Qs:
>>>
>>> - Are we getting any kind of support by LLVM/Clang developers?
>>>
>>> - Are we able in some way to have our own ~benchmark to support
>>> contrary statements?
>>>
>>> - Are we going to go ahead with this experimental thing?
>>> * if yes: what is the point? IIRC that choice was - mainly - to
>>> actract new developers to our project. Where are they? It seems the
>>> expectation failed. And while seeing it from an end-user POV, I would
>>> surely be curious and/or interested but if I had to choose my everyday
>>> work distro I would prefer an experiment or a well tested and reliable
>>> one?
>>>
>>> In my poor experience, I have the feeling that current compiler is
>>> more source of troubles than actually help. afaics a good number of
>>> bugs, many of them against core packages, got fixed by rebuilding with
>>> GCC. Ask Fedya...
>>>
>>> I have definitely no skills to carry on this topic, btw. Just bringing
>>> some points for discussion (maybe).
>>>
>>> 2016-08-22 8:37 GMT+02:00 rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com>:
>>>> Kind of expecting that btw... :-/
>>>> I was been monitoring phoronix on purpose.
>>>>
>>>> Sent by my mobile.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ____________________
>>> Best regards,
>>> Cristina
>>
>> --
>> Raphaël J.
>
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Best regards,
> Cristina
More information about the OM-Cooker
mailing list