[om-council] Council meeting April 21st follow-up [2]
rugyada
rugyada at gmail.com
Sat Apr 23 02:49:42 EDT 2016
Hi,
2016-04-23 3:06 GMT+02:00 Kate Lebedeff <kate at lebedeff.co.uk>:
>
> this gets us back (imo) to discussion about rolling release
>
> and this part by Bero "(something the competitors have never done)” - could become our yet another strong point - to PR hard
>
> IF we figure out how to do it without burning out our very valued people
>
Just a thought,
we may want to read this log:
https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/OpenMandriva:Technical/M20130528
This is TC meeting of.... ---> Tuesday 2013-05-28 !!! :) <----
Guess worth to read around from:
[11:20] <bero> And possibly to talk about the 2 cookers idea
Excerpting some lines:
[11:20] <bero> And possibly to talk about the 2 cookers idea
[11:20] <Xu|Mobile> 2 cookers? As in branching?
[11:23] <bero> 2 cookers: That's an idea that would allow users to
stay on current stuff without risking breaking the system by running
full cooker
[11:24] <bero> Ideally, I'd like QA to test packages that hit cooker,
and copy them to cooker-stable after making sure it doesn't break
things badly
[11:27] <bero> We just have to make sure we have enough people to
maintain the stable cooker branch
[11:27] <rugyada> thrill cooker & rolling cooker ? :)
[11:27] <Xu|Mobile> QA will have to do some recruiting...
[11:27] <Xu|Mobile> rugyada: that's one way of putting it :)
[11:27] <bero> rugyada: yes - those may actually be good names
[11:28] <rugyada> ;)
[11:28] <rugyada> the less thrilling cooker may be a kind of rolling release
--
____________________
Best regards,
Cristina
More information about the OM-Council
mailing list