<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font face="Bitstream Vera Sans">OK, thanks for letting us know.</font><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Ye Olde Curmudgeon
Ben Bullard
ben79
--------------------
OpenMandriva-QA Team
</pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/26/2016 04:18 AM, Bernhard
Rosenkraenzer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:c70c6f3180ed216bc9a60dd9e4b39c5f@lindev.ch"
type="cite">Hi,
<br>
<br>
On 2016-06-25 20:59, Ben Bullard wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">found package(s):
virtualbox-5.0.22-1-omv2015.0.x86_64
virtualbox-5.0.20-1-omv2015.0.x86_64
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Minor problem there: looks like abf is "forgetting" once again to
remove old versions.
<br>
But that doesn't matter, urpmi selects 5.0.22 anyway.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Is this going to work? Shouldn't it also
be pulling:
<br>
<br>
dkms 2.2.0.3.1 3.20130827.13 omv
2015.0 noarch
<br>
dkms-virtualbox 5.0.22 1 omv
2015.0 x86_64
<br>
patch 2.7.5 2 omv
2015.0 x86_64
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Not anymore.
<br>
<br>
The modules are now provided in the kernel-release package.
<br>
I moved them into the kernel package because:
<br>
1. With the guest-side VirtualBox modules we finally have plymouth
working in vbox
<br>
2. Drops the need for non-developers to have compilers and all
installed
<br>
3. Slow bootup after kernel updates from rebuilding the modules,
potentially causing hard to read errors
<br>
<br>
We still provide the dkms-virtualbox package for people building
their own kernels, but it's no longer required for people using
our kernels.
<br>
(Currently this is only in kernel-release, will add it to the next
build of kernel-rc as well)
<br>
<br>
ttyl
<br>
bero
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>