[om-infra] Discourse old poll

Raphaël Jadot rj at hodo.fr
Sun Mar 13 11:01:59 EDT 2016


Good question, I had to go back to test-passed rather than stable to fix the poll problem.

I don't know why my ticket is no more available…

There are some hints of how we could manage it here:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-often-do-you-update-your-installation-tests-passed/40498

Note that I have made security updates on all our machines excepted garnet which seems to have a problem.

13.03.2016, 11:56, "Jean-Claude Vanier" <jclvanier at gmail.com>:
> The poll functionality is implemented as a plugin.
> Installing a plugin is not direct but the updates are easy (admin/upgrade).
> Actually, the plugin "poll" is up to date.
> I think we should define a kind of rule for updating discourse: who do
> it, when ?
> Currently, the dasboard says "You're up to date!" (latest 1.5.0.beta12)
> But the upgrade page says:
> "New Version Available!
> Remote Version:
> Last Updated: a day ago"
> and invites to upgrade to the latest version.
> Which page should we trust?
> Imo, let's stick on the dashboard.
>
> Other question: backups
> The setting is "backup frequency: 7 days".
> But, there were no backup since 2016-02-29.
> I started a backup manually.
>
> Like for the upgrade, I think we should define who will manage the
> "health" of the forum and write a a check list in the bbw.
>
> Any suggestion?
>
> 2016-03-09 23:44 GMT+01:00 Raphaël Jadot <rj at hodo.fr>:
>>  Fixed.
>>
>>  You're right, in fact the best solution is to use the local pgsql manager and use port forwarding. I need some time to study it unless someone else wants to do? :P
>>
>>  09.03.2016, 13:06, "Jean-Claude Vanier" <jclvanier at gmail.com>:
>>>  But this is not straightforward in this case. A convenient tool (like
>>>  phpmyadmin) should be installed and the bbw page has to be written.
>>>  There are also backups in quartz.
>>>
>>>  2016-03-09 12:29 GMT+01:00 rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com>:
>>>>   2016-03-09 12:26 GMT+01:00 Jean-Claude Vanier <jclvanier at gmail.com>:
>>>>>   We probably have to look into the DB
>>>>
>>>>   Ah, ok :)
>>>>   Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>   --
>>>>   ____________________
>>>>   Best regards,
>>>>   Cristina
>>>>
>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>>   OM-Infra mailing list
>>>>   OM-Infra at ml.openmandriva.org
>>>>   http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-infra_ml.openmandriva.org
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  OM-Infra mailing list
>>>  OM-Infra at ml.openmandriva.org
>>>  http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-infra_ml.openmandriva.org
>>
>>  --
>>  Raphaël J.
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  OM-Infra mailing list
>>  OM-Infra at ml.openmandriva.org
>>  http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-infra_ml.openmandriva.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Infra mailing list
> OM-Infra at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-infra_ml.openmandriva.org

--
Raphaël J.



More information about the OM-Infra mailing list