[om-council] What about 3.02 ISO ?
rugyada
rugyada at gmail.com
Tue Apr 18 09:12:38 EDT 2017
Ok. Please correct the following if you find something wrong:
1a) There is a serious bug in ISO build script including /testing repositories;
1b) Colin said that he found another one (I ignore what)
Colin said that he hoped to fix both of them hopefully for the past
weekend (thanks Colin). Any news? If he cannot -for whatever reason-
we have anyone who could take the task? imho at least 1a is a blocker
bug (while maybe easy&quick to fix), isn't it?
2a) Sunday 9, ISO builds failed very likely because of mirrors
error/misconfiguration. I checked the log, which failed at the very
end while adding repositories and "urpmi.update -a";
2b) Sunday 16 no ISO build started, so we cannot know if the supposed
mirrors bug has been fixed (by JCL).
3) Afaik, apart from 1a the previous ISOs were/are working fine. I can
give feedbacks only for VirtualBox installations.
May I suggest to set next steps?
It's better to wait for KApps update or we can have a new testing ISO
meanwhile (depending on Colin's report) ?
What do you think it could be the plan now?
2017-04-18 14:11 GMT+02:00 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero at lindev.ch>:
> Hi,
> we have scripts that automate the kapps update, but they aren't working well on this particular release because of the i18n packaging changes.
> Every related package requires a few simple changes that aren't easy to automate.
>
> I'm currently updating cooker, but it'll take a while.
>
> ttyl
> bero
>
> On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 00:02 CEST, Colin Close <itchka at compuserve.com> wrote:
>
>> Kapps is a big job is it automated in any way?
>> Best,
>> Colin
>>
--
____________________
Best regards,
Cristina
More information about the OM-Council
mailing list