[om-council] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? Fwd: Final text
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
bero at lindev.ch
Thu Dec 1 17:13:33 EST 2016
Hi,
For 1., I'd say yes for 3.0, partially for 2014.x (already obsolete and we lack the manpower to push updates to 3 versions) but 2014.x should really be discouraged.
For 2., I wonder why anyone would want to use Chrome as opposed to Chromium (almost exactly the same thing, except the latter is Open Source and can be modified as we need it)? Chrome does run on OMLx, so it shouldn't be a big deal - but Chromium is preferable in every way (and easier to do for us too, given we already maintain packages). What SHOULD be a big deal for his customers: Chromium is built from source so we know what it does, while Chrome might just share all their data with Google and the US government as it pleases.
ttyl
bero
On Thursday, December 01, 2016 19:44 CET, Kate Lebedeff <kate at lebedeff.co.uk> wrote:
Dear council
We are receiving 1000$ from PoliLinux, good news!
Same time they are asking us the beliw
Please lets discuss
Cheers
>
> Some things that is very important to us:
>
> 1. Keep the main applications of 2014.2 and Lx 3.0 version updated frequently, because the users that are using Linux can update, for example, Firefox, thunderbird, LibreOffice, etc.
>
> 2. Can you let me know if OpenMandriva can distribute Chrome browser? If not, do you think is possible to sing an agreement with google for this?
>
_______________________________________________
OM-Council mailing list
OM-Council at ml.openmandriva.org
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-council_ml.openmandriva.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/private/om-council_ml.openmandriva.org/attachments/20161201/ec0b6e63/attachment.html>
More information about the OM-Council
mailing list