[OM Cooker] Lx 3.0 RC1 candidate.
Kate Lebedeff
kate at lebedeff.co.uk
Thu Jul 14 17:14:35 EDT 2016
I wonder where from we could get changes from Beta2 status
> On 14Jul, 2016, at 23:11, Ben Bullard <benbullard79 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> Do we need a blog post or something?
> Ben Bullard
> ben79
> --------------------
> OpenMandriva-QA Team
> On 07/14/2016 03:39 PM, Colin Close wrote:
>> I agree with this..it's really not wise to put a major update such as this into the distro when we are at RC.
>> Far better to finish the release where we are now backpoting any sensible fixes that cure bugs.
>> Then the big changes can go into the testing repos and released when they have been given the test of time.
>> Best,
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 13 July 2016 13:14:46 BST Tomasz Gajc wrote:
>>> I'd suggest to do it with small steps. I'm afraid update Qt to 5.7 version.
>>>
>>> 2016-07-13 13:06 GMT+02:00 Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin <nobodydead at gmail.com <mailto:nobodydead at gmail.com>
>>>> :
>>>> Well ok, but do it for all arches!
>>>>
>>>> 2016-07-13 14:02 GMT+03:00 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero at lindev.ch> <mailto:bero at lindev.ch>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-07-13 12:57, Tomasz Gajc wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> lately KDE Frameworks 5.24.0 has been released, same as KDE Apps 16.04.3
>>>>>>
>>>>> And Plasma Desktop 5.7.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> They all seem to work great in Cooker, so I'm not strictly opposed even
>>>>> though I don't think we should delay the release any longer...
>>>>> If we decide to go for it, we should also backport Qt 5.7, since that
>>>>> combination has been tested in cooker while the new KDE stuff + Qt 5.6 is
>>>>> largely untested.
>>>>> I've also fixed the issue with kdesu creating loads of sockets in / in Qt
>>>>> in cooker, and QtWebEngine 5.7 is based on a newer version of Chromium that
>>>>> fixes some security bugs - so at least backporting Qt may be a good idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> ttyl
>>>>> bero
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>>>>> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org <mailto:OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org>
>>>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org <http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>>>> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org <mailto:OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org>
>>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org <http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org <mailto:OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org>
>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org <http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> OM-Cooker at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/attachments/20160714/a250e800/attachment.html>
More information about the OM-Cooker
mailing list