[om-council] Again "Beta" misunderstanding
Kate Lebedeff
kate at lebedeff.co.uk
Tue Mar 1 06:13:50 EST 2016
Thank you Cristina
> On 1Mar, 2016, at 12:00, rugyada <rugyada at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016-02-28 17:30 GMT+01:00 Jean-Claude Vanier <jclvanier at gmail.com>:
>> Imo, it 's too late to change anything for this iso. But we could
>> think about a "gamma" iso (or a beta2) if we release a pre-candidate.
>>
>
> In my opinion, the beta release *scheduled* (we'll see...) for the end
> of this week we could name it Beta1.
> Silently... without any unnecessary redundant comment - unless
> explicitly asked, in such case we need to keep at hand an agreed reply
> like: Fosdem iso has been just a [technical preview? foretaste? early
> test? sample pack? ....?] // put here the most proper definition you
> like // to show, waiting for actual Beta.
>
> I've read around of some projects who start the whole beta stage
> naming their releases beta1, beta2, beta3 if any. So not simply "beta"
> namely without any number.
>
> I guess this will be a kind of workaround to come out in an elegant
> way from the impasse.
> In my Italian country we have a saying "Salvare capra e cavoli" which
> means to someway solve a deadlock situation, but I cannot provide you
> any enlightening English translation to give the right sense :)
>
> Hoping that this topic will serve as a lesson for the future.
> Frankly speaking I believe we have to spend our limited free time
> focusing on real issues instead of to be annoyed with solving
> avoidable stupid problems. IMHO.
>
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Best regards,
> Cristina
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Council mailing list
> OM-Council at ml.openmandriva.org
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-council_ml.openmandriva.org
More information about the OM-Council
mailing list